‘As insane as the people who admire them’

A snippet from a piece on Turner which got me thinking about how one should establish, maintain and develop one’s painting style…

Let’s begin with the testimony of the painter Frith in the celebrated case of Whistler vs. Ruskin

‘He (Frith) was then asked what he thought about Turner, and in particular whether Turner was an idol of Ruskin’s.

‘Yes,’ Frith agreed, ‘and I think he should be an idol of everybody.’

‘Do you know one of Turner’s works at Marlborough House called “the Snowstorm”?’

‘Yes, I do.’

‘Are you aware that it has been described by a critic as a mass of soapsuds and whitewash?’

‘I am not.’

‘Would you call it a mass of soapsuds and whitewash?’

‘I think it very likely I should,’ said Frith, causing more laughter.  ‘When I say Turner should be the idol of everybody, I refer to his earlier works, but not to his later ones, which are as insane as the people who admire them.’

And so it goes: invention invites ridicule.

Turner_-_Venice_with_the_Salute_-_Google_Art_Project

Turner’s Salute: Original vision invites ridicule…

It’s the easiest thing in the world to become an admired painter – just paint in a style which other people approve of. Turner did it and was fêted.

Starting with dark ‘Dutch style’ works Turner quickly moved on to lighter, brighter, Italianate works inspired by Claude. Approbation followed as night follows day, but in his heart of hearts Turner must have known he was re-imagining the works of other men.

For many painters (and almost any gallery) this is enough, to be the next Kurt Jackson, Adrian Ghenie, Jenny Saville, Peter Doig .. just look at a serious Open Art competition near you.

Jenny-Saville-Reverse-2003

Jenny Saville’s outstanding work; an original vision I think…

blue7.jpg

Creativity starts with imitation…

But is it enough for you to be a copyist? Be honest now. Picasso was very honest when he reflected on how he – just like Turner – spent his career working towards what was expected by the art critics of his day:

‘I myself, since Cubism and before, have satisfied these masters and critics with all the changing oddities which passed through my head, and the less they understood me, the more they admired me.

By amusing myself with all these games, with all these absurdities, puzzles, rebuses, arabesques , I became famous and that very quickly. And fame for a painter means sales, gains, fortune, riches.  And today, as you know, I am celebrated, I am rich.  But when I am alone with myself I have not the courage to think of myself as an artist in the great and ancient sense of the term. Giotto, Titian, Rembrandt were great painters: I am only a public entertainer who has understood his times and exploited as best he could the imbecility, the vanity, the cupidity of his contemporaries. Mine is a bitter confession, more painful than may appear, but it has the merit of being sincere.’

So the question and the lesson is this dear reader: approbation is one thing, satisfaction and creative fulfilment quite another. As I’ve written elsewhere in this Blog, developing one’s style from a great artist is absolutely normal ; just don’t kid yourself it’s anything more than a means to an end.

The wonderful Andrew Salgado (who painted the blue reverse Jenny Saville above) moved on to much greater, things and now is the unhappy object of thousands of Salgado-a -like  painters. Let’s hope they discover their own creative visions.

Back to insanity, and the point of this note:

A process is at work here: start by finding a painter you admire, and get that style under your skin. When the plaudits arrive, don’t swallow your own PR and convince yourself that you are a creative genius; your work is just a mirror to other popular styles.

Buttermere and Crummock Water. Oil 30x40%22 205 by Martin Kinnear

Buttermere by Martin Kinnear – or is it Ruisdael, or Turner? Anyway it sold and I could have painted these until I died in harness and lived very well.

Now do something original in the knowledge they’ll be no shortage of people queuing up to say that ‘you’ve lost the plot’. I know this to be true because my sell out show, The Painted Garden was a radical departure from what I’d been selling to clients through galleries for years. It was a huge creative, not to mention financial risk, but when I considered the alternative, Picasso’s warning rang in my ears.
Version 2

‘What have you done?’ was a memorable comment. About 50 large canvases, and gaining a new creative freedom was the answer.

Here’s to the insane.

 

 

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s