Who’s it for and why should you care?

Painting is Dead. I’ve been hearing this for years.

Actually it might be alive a bit, let’s hold a mirror under its nose.

For a ‘dead Art’ it’s looking pretty rosy, every time I go to a blockbuster exhibition it’s on painting, of paintings, by painters; with ticket holders queuing around the block to get in. Not bad for a corpse.

Lazarus like,  Painting has dragged itself once again from the sepulchre in the form of Turner: Adventures in Colour at the wonderful Tate Contemporary, Margate, from Oct 8 2016.

turner adventures in colour

Wonderful, because it’s in Margate – a town redolent of its glorious and faded past and very relevant to Turner, it’s most famous resident artist. A visit to Margate soon reveals his fascination with the place (beyond the earthy charms of Mrs Booth of course); the light here is breathtaking, almost Venetian, and it’s to Venice where we must go to get under the skin of this show.

By his mid 20’s, Turner was knocking out dark tonal oils for fun. It’s a simple method based on ébauche, and used by all of the greats from Caravaggio to Van De Velde. The thing about ébauche is that it’s a tonal, dark, sturdy, almost protestant way to paint. Great for Dutch Boats in A Gale, Plagues of Egypt and all that, but not any answer to the luminous, ephemeral works of that greatest of Masters, Claude.

Claude did subtle. His pictures are nothing if not confections of colour, light and melting forms. If Turner wanted to be taken seriously he had to get Italianate.

I’ve not seen the show yet (I didn’t see it in France), although I know the work & have written about it for Artists & Illustrators, and I can’t wait to go.

So what do I hope to take from the show? I love Turner’s work and admire the man, but the last thing I want to be is a Turner-a-like, so it is to the ideas behind the work rather than its’ techniques which I’ll turn when the show starts.

For me, Turner’s key idea is ‘orchestration’ that’s to say his pictures are not of discrete things ( a house, a boat, a tree) but continuities joined by light and obfuscated by atmosphere. This, I think, is what he meant when he wrote of ‘Rembrandt’s mystic veil of colour, pierced by form.’

sun setting over a lake, Tate

Cohesion and unity of vision, that’s the key to it

When my painting starts to look disjointed, I recall the unity, the vision, the cohesion of Turner’s work and the clouds of doubt lift.

One thought on “Who’s it for and why should you care?

  1. I love that description of ebauche being an almost protestant way of painting; it almost constrains.
    Reading your description of Turner’s later orchestration is something I’d like to explore, almost as if he could do with oils what I wanted for so many years watercolour would do for me (or, I could do with watercolour, is probably more precise!). Exploring skies is so exciting now. I wish I could be in Margate for this!

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s